Skip to main content

The Nuclear Family Isn't Enough. Can We Weave Our Own Extended Families?

David Brooks has a long and fascinating article in The Atlantic about how we need to embrace extended families, not just those related by blood, to repair our social fabric. Weavers provide the kind of care to others that many of us provide only to kinβ€”the kind of support that used to be provided by the extended family.

"This is the story of our timesβ€”the story of the family, once a dense cluster of many siblings and extended kin, fragmenting into ever smaller and more fragile forms. The initial result of that fragmentation, the nuclear family, didn’t seem so bad. But then, because the nuclear family is so brittle, the fragmentation continued. In many sectors of society, nuclear families fragmented into single-parent families, single-parent families into chaotic families or no families.


If you want to summarize the changes in family structure over the past century, the truest thing to say is this: We’ve made life freer for individuals and more unstable for families. We’ve made life better for adults but worse for children. We’ve moved from big, interconnected, and extended families, which helped protect the most vulnerable people in society from the shocks of life, to smaller, detached nuclear families (a married couple and their children), which give the most privileged people in society room to maximize their talents and expand their options. The shift from bigger and interconnected extended families to smaller and detached nuclear families ultimately led to a familial system that liberates the rich and ravages the working-class and the poor.


... When we discuss the problems confronting the country, we don’t talk about family enough. It feels too judgmental. Too uncomfortable. Maybe even too religious. But the blunt fact is that the nuclear family has been crumbling in slow motion for decades, and many of our other problemsβ€”with education, mental health, addiction, the quality of the labor forceβ€”stem from that crumbling. We’ve left behind the nuclear-family paradigm of 1955. For most people it’s not coming back.



Americans are hungering to live in extended and forged families, in ways that are new and ancient at the same time. This is a significant opportunity, a chance to thicken and broaden family relationships, a chance to allow more adults and children to live and grow under the loving gaze of a dozen pairs of eyes, and be caught, when they fall, by a dozen pairs of arms. For decades we have been eating at smaller and smaller tables, with fewer and fewer kin.



It’s time to find ways to bring back the big tables."



How do you face the challenge of treating others as family in a culture that tells us our first, and only, obligation is to protect and help those in our nuclear family?

Read the full article in The Atlantic.

Add Comment

Comments (2)

Newest · Oldest · Popular
Lisa, I never thought about the possible harm that comes from focusing on uncovering abuse in families rather than trying to find strengths in the extended family or the community that might support children and their parents. We typically find what we look for. Searching for abuse makes us see a world full of abuse. Searching for strengths helps us find a world of strengths. Interesting - and sad - that our individualistic, risk-focused culture is reflected in our child welfare system. Thanks for the sharing your experience.
Michael Skoler
I couldn't agree more with this blog, or David's thought provoking article. For 25 years, my organization and team have been working to encourage formal child welfare systems to involve extended family in decisions when their children come to the attention of the public agencies. Since the inception of child protection laws, we have systematically seen extended family systems as threats, broken vehicles and complicit in any harm that a parent/caregiver may have caused a child. What would a system look like that instead of spending 80% of its time on investigating allegations of abuse/harm and then recording those imperfect data in a database, spent 80% of its time on gathering the extended family to sort out what to do next? Systems have oppressive and paternalistic tendencies, but these can be kept in check when we invite extended families to be part of the solution and stop seeing them as part of the problem. In New Zealand, they view children as belonging to a family system, and not as the property of parents. There is plenty of opportunity in the United States to help systems and the "service providers" in those systems to embrace a broader definition of family, and serve them accordingly. Each of us would define our "family" differently, now, wouldn't we?
Lisa Merkel-Holguin
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×